Skip to main content

Ibrutinib Treatment in Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia: Follow-Up Efficacy and Safety from the iNNOVATE Study

Conference Correspondent - ASH 2018 - Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Prior reports have indicated that the combination of ibrutinib and rituximab showed sustained responses and a manageable toxicity profile in rituximab-refractory Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (Dimopoulos MA, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016). Here, researchers present follow-up findings from the phase 3 iNNOVATE study.

There were 3 treatment arms in the study. Patients in the randomized part of the trial received prior rituximab therapy and required a response to their last rituximab-based regimen. These patients were randomized to either daily 420 mg of ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) or placebo plus rituximab (R) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 per week intravenously at weeks 1 to 4 and 17 to 20. In an open-label substudy, patients who failed to achieve a minor response or better, or relapsed within 12 months of their last rituximab-containing therapy, received daily 420 mg of ibrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

With extended follow-up and a median duration of treatment of 33.4 months, overall response rates (ORRs) were 95% with IR versus 48% with R (P <.0001), respectively. With continued IR treatment, 25% of patients achieved a very good partial response compared with only 3% in the R arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached with IR versus 20.3 months with R (hazard ratio, 0.22 [0.12-0.39]; P <.0001). At 36 months, PFS was 76% for patients receiving IR treatment versus 31% for R. The 36-month overall survival (OS) rates were 93% for IR and 90% for R, a nonsignificant difference.

Completion of treatment was 93% among patients receiving IR compared with 71% in patients receiving R. Overall, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 49% of patients in the IR arm and 42% in the R arm.

In the open-label substudy, 31 patients received single-agent ibrutinib. In this group, with longer follow-up, median PFS was 41 months, estimated 36-month PFS was 61%, ORR was 90%, and estimated 36-month OS was 84%. Median duration of ibrutinib treatment was 38.4 months, with no major hemorrhagic or atrial fibrillation events reported. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 77% of patients; however, no fatal AEs were reported.

Researchers concluded that IR showed continued superiority over R in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, regardless of genotypic factors. In both relevant study arms, ibrutinib had a manageable safety profile and no new safety signals were identified with longer follow-up.

Buske C, et al. ASH 2018. Abstract 149.

Related Items
Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, and Chemoimmunotherapy in First-Line Treatment of CLL
Conference Correspondent published on December 4, 2018 in ASH 2018 - Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group: Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib-Based Therapy in Untreated Younger Patients with CLL
Conference Correspondent published on December 4, 2018 in ASH 2018 - Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Prognostic Testing and Treatment Approaches in Patients with CLL: Interim Analysis of the informCLL Real-World Registry
Conference Correspondent published on December 4, 2018 in ASH 2018 - Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Acalabrutinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory and High-Risk, Treatment-Naïve CLL
Conference Correspondent published on December 4, 2018 in ASH 2018 - Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Frontline Ibrutinib Treatment Is Associated with Lower Total Cost of Care Compared with Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with CLL
Conference Correspondent published on December 2, 2018 in ASH 2018 - Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Last modified: August 30, 2021