Building Your Automated Bundled Payment for an Episode-of-Care Initiative

September/October 2011 Volume 4, Number 6 - Industry Trends
Douglas Moeller, MD
Download PDF

Douglas Moeller, MDPayers and providers are looking to “bundled payments” as the payment reform most likely to deliver cost-savings and drive positive outcomes. Bundled payment generally refers to a lump sum paid to providers for a predefined episode of care. Several pilot projects are under way to test and refine this innovative payment model, initially focusing on a handful of surgical procedures but with an eye toward expanding to other services and chronic conditions. The intent is to reward value, not volume, by providing incentives to providers across settings to coordinate their efforts toward evidence-based care while reducing complications and duplicated services.

Projections have pointed to bundled payment as one of the more promising approaches for controlling healthcare spending, largely by reducing avoidable complications. A 2009 report from The Commonwealth Fund projected that bundling payments for acute care episodes could potentially reduce health expenditures in the United States by as much as $300 billion between 2010 and 2020.1

In the same year, an estimate from a team at RAND projected that one model of bundled payments for 6 chronic and 4 acute conditions could reduce the national health spending by 5.4% between 2010 and 2019.2 More than a decade earlier, in the early 1990s, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initiated its experiment in bundling payments in Medicare for coronary bypass surgery, which showed savings of roughly 10%.3 The question is then, why is the use of bundled payments fairly limited today?

The Implementation Challenge

As a physician participating in that early-1990s Medicare project, I saw firsthand the potential of bundled payments but also the challenges of implementation. Small projects have shown their worth with manual claims processing and reconciliation. However, a program large enough to deliver meaningful impact requires a supporting infrastructure to offset the administrative burden. Bringing a program to scale requires clinical and financial automation, which until recently was not available.

The complexities of bundled payments create “substantial implementation challenges” and “the need for reliable software to automate bundled payment,” according to Robert E. Mechanic, of the Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, and Executive Director of the Health Industry Forum.4 Mr Mechanic calls for immediate investments “to develop administratively feasible, economically sustainable, scalable programs,” and describes ongoing development of software to “automatically convert feefor- service claims into episode-based payments—an extremely complex endeavor but one that could greatly reduce insurers’ administrative barriers.”4

Our experience has shown that technological innovations provide health plans with the flexibility to manage bundled claims even in the loosely organized networks of physicians and hospitals that characterize the majority of US healthcare delivery systems.

The 4 Key Areas for Technology Support

Our experience in pilot projects with health plans and other payers has led us to define 4 areas of automation for a successful bundled payment program. At a minimum, technology must be able to support health plans (and subsequently providers) with these key activities:

1. Define a care episode and recognize the starting and stopping points (front-end). Defining included and excluded services is probably the single most important determinant of success. This requires payer–provider collaboration to itemize components for every step in the bundle (eg, clinical laboratory, imaging, anesthesia services). The beginning and end of a care episode must be defined and recognizable to the claims payment process (ideally during a care episode preauthorization or registration process), with a signal that a care episode is under way or will start at some future time.

The wide range of possibilities poses a challenge to many systems. Urgent procedures, such as cardiac catheterization for new chest pain, may have a minimum preintervention period, and the starting point may be the surgery itself. Elective surgeries, by contrast, will have a starting point (such as 30 days before a total knee replacement) and a trigger point (decision to initiate a care episode) sometime after the diagnosis, when the decision for surgery is made, and surgery may occur weeks later.

A follow-up period (such as 90 days after surgery) must also be defined. For chronic conditions, such as chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cancer, the episodes of care will typically be defined as a fixed time interval.

2. Resolving the care episode with accurate financial management (back-end). The claims submission process generally is used to track resources used in a bundled care episode, and a claims-processing system must be able to recognize excluded and included services and pay them according to the compensation model. Preventable complications must be clearly defined at the outset, so the stakeholders understand their risk. Once the episode is under way, electronic notifications from the health plan to providers can help in the financial management of bundling claims. Enhanced claims processing and management must be able to look across claim types to autoadjudicate contract terms.

3. Managing clinical care. This is the core of the bundled payment process and is essential to moving care toward best practices while using resources efficiently. An ideal solution helps care coordination across multiple sites and integrates expert decision-support content. The care episode definition that triggers financial management can also be used to generate provider alerts and reminders to drive care through appropriate pathways and keep the patient “on track.”

4. Providing analytics for action. Powerful analytics are essential to creating the information feedback loops that drive program refinement. Clinical and financial performance metrics must be able to identify variances from best practices in (or near) real time to trigger alerts that can help modify care, either for an individual patient while a care episode is under way, or for a provider overall.

Whether the bundled payment amount is tied to services used by a single patient or tied to average utilization, knowing what resources were used for each patient is important, because it can point to variations in care or utilization that signal opportunities for improvement. Shared information between payers and providers helps them to align their efforts to achieve a common goal.

Fast-Forward to Success

Many organizations are closely watching current CMS projects, particularly its Acute Care Episode demonstration project that bundles Medicare Part A and Part B for orthopedic and cardiac inpatient surgical services at 5 sites.5 Results are not expected until 2013, but early positive reports include cost reductions, shared costsavings, and greater use of evidence-based medicine.4,6

Another program, announced this summer, invites providers to define and build episodes of care with 4 different models of bundled payments, selecting for themselves which episodes and services will be bundled.7

Organizations setting out on this path may feel stymied by the many choices they have to manage. One challenge is to define the network of providers. Highly integrated delivery systems, notably Geisinger Health System and Kaiser Permanente HMO, have shown successful results for episode-based payments. A pilot program through California’s Integrated Health Association is taking the model to a broader group of payers and providers and independent practice associations more typical of care delivery throughout the country.8

Payers also face a range of compensation options, including (1) a lump sum paid before or after the episode; (2) a reconciliation process that aggregates claims for all included services and pays based on a targeted goal; and (3) a modified fee-for-service payment at the start, before moving to a lump sum. One model may work well for an elective surgery, another may make more sense for a diagnostic procedure, and a hybrid may work best for a third type of care episode. Varied compensation models are viable if the payer’s technology for automating payments has the flexibility to adapt to varied compensation models.

For most health plans, bundled payments represent new territory. Many will need assistance—first, in determining which episodes, which regions, and which providers are most suited for collaboration. But plans need not wait to get started. The necessary technology and experience are currently available to help plans move ahead now in creating their own episode-ofcare programs.

To jump-start the first episode of care, packaged options of predefined bundles with industry-standard content are available now (or custom-made care episodes can be purchased). When the right workflow technology is then applied to manage the administrative burden, a bundled payment program can be on the fast track toward meaningful results.

Author Disclosure Statement

Dr Moeller is an employee of McKesson Health Solutions, which provides software programs for bundled payments.

Douglas Moeller, MD is Medical Director, McKesson Health Solutions, Malvern, PA

References

  1. The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System. The Path to a High Performance U.S. Health System: A 2020 Vision and the Policies to Pave the Way. February 2009. www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/ Fund%20Report/2009/Feb/The%20Path%20to%20a%20High%20Performance%20US%20Health%20System/1237_Commission_path_high_perform_US_hlt_sys _WEB_rev_03052009.pdf. Accessed September 7, 2011.
  2. Hussey P, Eibner C, Ridgely MS, McGlynn EA. Controlling U.S. health care spending—separating promising from unpromising approaches. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:2109-2111. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
  3. Health Care Financing Administration. Medicare Participating Heart Bypass Center Demonstration. Extramural Research Report. September 1998. www.cms.gov/reports/ downloads/oregon2_1998_3.pdf. Accessed September 7, 2011.
  4. Mechanic RE. Opportunities and challenges for episode-based payment. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:777-779. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
  5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare News: CMS Announces Sites for a Demonstration to Encourage Greater Collaboration and Improve Quality Using Bundled Hospital Payments. January 6, 2009. www.cms.gov/DemoProjectsEval Rpts/downloads/ACEPressRelease.pdf. Accessed July 8, 2010.
  6. Vesely R. An ACE in the deck? Bundled-payment demo shows returns for hospitals, physicians, patients. Modern Healthcare. February 7, 2011. www.modernhealth care.com/article/20110207/MAGAZINE/110209990#ixzz1XGbTKnjZ. Accessed September 7, 2011.
  7. HealthCare.gov. Improving care coordination and lowering costs by bundling payments. www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/bundling08232011a.html. Accessed September 7, 2011.
  8. Integrated Healthcare Association. Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA) launches episode of care payment project. April 26, 2010. www.iha.org/pdfs_docu ments/news_events/04_26_10_BundledEpisodePaymentPressRelease.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2011.
Related Items
Value-Based Agreements in Healthcare: Willingness versus Ability
Gary Branning, MBA, Michael Lynch, CPA, MBA, Kathryn Hayes
September 2019 Vol 12, No 5 published on September 17, 2019 in Industry Trends
US Healthcare Trends and Contradictions in 2019
F. Randy Vogenberg, PhD
February 2019 Vol 12, No 1 published on February 6, 2019 in Industry Trends
A Shift in Party Majority, a Shift in Priority? What the Pharmaceutical Industry Can Expect
Gary Branning, MBA, Randy Ross, BA, Kathryn Hayes
February 2019 Vol 12, No 1 published on February 6, 2019 in Industry Trends
FDA Commissioner Outlines New Plan to Increase Biosimilars by Balancing Innovation and Competition
Eileen Koutnik-Fotopoulos
November 2018 Vol 11, No 8 published on November 30, 2018 in Industry Trends
New Rivals: Integrating Health Benefits to Provide Comprehensive Patient Care
Gary Branning, MBA, Martha Vater
April 2018 Vol 11, No 2 published on April 13, 2018 in Industry Trends
Last modified: April 5, 2012
  •  Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Oncology Practice Management
  • Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Care in Rheumatology
  • Rheumatology Practice Management
  • Urology Practice Management
  • Lynx CME