Host Factors Important in Patients with Myeloma

February 2013 Vol 6, No 1, Special Issue - Multiple Myeloma
Caroline Helwick

Median overall survival (OS) for patients with multiple myeloma has improved substantially in the past 10 years, thanks to the approval of a number of new drugs. For patients who can undergo transplants, survival exceeds 80% at 5 years. But although many patients can live 7 to 10 years after diagnosis, outcomes can be highly variable, according to S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD, Professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN.

Patient factors are largely responsible for this variation, he said. Host factors that shift patients into the poor prognosis category include a performance status of 3 or 4, renal failure, advanced age, stage III disease (high tumor burden), and high-risk tumor biology.

Although patients with hyperdiploidy t(11;14) and t(6;14) are considered to be at standard risk for disease progression, those with t(14;16), t(14;20), deletion 17p, and high-risk gene-expression profile signatures have a high risk. “Even with the best-available therapy, these patients have a median survival of only about 2.5 years,” Dr Rajkumar noted.

In the intermediate-risk range is the t(4;14) subset. Their risk is “intermediate,” he said, “not because survival falls between the standard-risk and high-risk patients, but because they can have better outcomes if they are treated in a particular manner.”

Risk-Adapted Treatment
“What we know about these subtypes is that standard-risk patients do very well regardless of the therapy, with a median survival of more than 7 to 10 years now,” Dr Rajkumar observed. “But intermediate-risk patients do well only if given bortez­omib early in the disease, followed by transplant, followed by bortezomib-based consolidation, followed by maintenance therapy for 2 to 3 years. Many studies have shown that with this approach, survival in this group is similar to, if not the same as, standard-risk patients.”

“On the other hand, you can give high-risk patients all the therapies we have, and they still have a median survival of 2.5 years,” he noted. In this group, the achievement of a complete response (CR) is critical, Dr Rajkumar emphasized.

In a study from the Arkansas group using the total therapy tandem transplant regimen, the 18-month survival rate was only 13% among high-risk patients when a CR was not achieved, whereas it exceeded 80% among complete responders (Haessler J, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:7073-7079). In low-risk patients, OS was 87% regardless of whether patients achieved a CR.

Treatment should be adapted to this underlying risk, Dr Rajkumar emphasized. “Often, which approach the pa­tient receives will depend on which physician they see, but we should always put the patient in the center. We should look at host factors, stage, tumor burden, tumor biology, and patient tolerability and preference, and individualize therapy accordingly,” he stressed.

Related Items
FDA Approves Darzalex Combination for First-Line Treatment of Transplant-Eligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Web Exclusives published on September 27, 2019 in FDA Approvals, Multiple Myeloma, In the News
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Combination Demonstrates High Response Rate in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Chase Doyle
January/February 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASH 2018 Highlights published on February 27, 2019 in Multiple Myeloma
Pomalidomide Added to the Regimen in First Relapse Extends PFS in Multiple Myeloma
Wayne Kuznar
August 2018 Vol 11, Special Issue published on August 20, 2018 in Multiple Myeloma
ASCO 2017: Multiple Myeloma Highlights
August 2017, Vol 10, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASCO 2017 Highlights published on August 24, 2017 in Multiple Myeloma
CAR T-Cell Immunotherapy Makes Strides in Multiple Myeloma, with Durable Remission
Wayne Kuznar
August 2017, Vol 10, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASCO 2017 Highlights published on August 24, 2017 in Multiple Myeloma
Last modified: March 4, 2013
  •  Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Oncology Practice Management
  • Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Care in Rheumatology
  • Rheumatology Practice Management
  • Urology Practice Management
  • Lynx CME