First-Line Ibrutinib Improves Outcomes Compared with Current Standard of Care in Older Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

January/February 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASH 2018 Highlights - Leukemia
Wayne Kuznar

San Diego, CA—Front-line ibrutinib (Imbruvica) therapy results in a lower rate of disease progression or death than the current standard-of-care chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine (Ben­deka) and rituximab (Rituxan) in older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Adding rituximab to ibrutinib did not improve outcomes compared with ibrutinib alone, reported Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, Associate Professor, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, at ASH 2018.

Data from the international phase 3 clinical trial (Alliance A041202) of patients aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed CLL demonstrated a 2-year ­estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) of 87% in patients randomized to ibrutinib alone and 88% in those randomized to ibrutinib plus rituximab versus 74% in patients in the bendamustine plus rituximab arm.

After a median follow-up of 38 months, the median PFS was 43 months in the bendamustine plus rituximab arm and had not been reached in the 2 ibrutinib­containing arms.

No difference has yet emerged in overall survival (OS), which may be the result of crossover from the chemoimmunotherapy arm to an ibrutinib-containing regimen, as well as the short follow-up period, said Dr Woyach.

“At the time the study was designed, bendamustine-rituximab was widely used in the community based on excellent data in the phase 2 setting,” she said. “During this time, the BTK [Bruton’s tyrosine kinase] inhibitor ibrutinib was just entering the clinic. Despite now widespread use in the front-line following its FDA approval for this indication in 2016, the efficacy of ibrutinib versus standard chemoimmunotherapy had not previously been investigated.”

Study Details

Ibrutinib, with or without rituximab, was compared with bendamustine-­rituximab in 547 patients (median age, 71 years) with treatment-naïve, intermediate- or high-risk CLL. Overall, 54% of patients had high-risk disease, and 25% had high-risk cytogenetics—deletion (del)17p or del11q.

Study participants were stratified according to disease risk (high or intermediate) and cytogenetics, and were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to 3 arms: arm A, bendamustine plus rituximab administered in six 28-day cycles (N = 183); arm B, oral ibrutinib (N = 182); and arm C, ibrutinib plus rituximab on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 2, and on day 1 of cycles 3 to 6 (N = 182).

Patients received treatment until disease progression or until unacceptable toxicity; patients randomized to arm A could cross over to arm B if their disease progressed.

Of the 547 patients, 96% were available for the primary PFS analysis. The 2-year PFS values translated to a lower risk of disease progression or death in the 2 ibrutinib-containing arms (hazard ratio, 0.39 for arm A vs arm B; 0.38 for arm A vs arm C; P <.001 for both).

The median OS has not been reached in any arm. The 2-year OS estimates for bendamustine plus rituximab, ibrutinib alone, and ibrutinib plus rituximab are 95%, 90%, and 94%, respectively.

Adverse Events

Grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events were more common in the chemoimmunotherapy group (61%) than in the ibrutinib-alone (41%) or ibrutinib plus rituximab group (38%). Overall, 40% of the bendamustine plus rituximab arm had grade ≥3 neutropenia compared with 15% to 21% of the ibrutinib-­containing arms.

Grade ≥3 nonhematologic adverse events were more common in the ibrutinib-containing arms (74%) versus the chemoimmunotherapy arm (63%). Grade ≥3 hypertension was 29% in the ibrutinib-alone arm and 34% in the ibrutinib plus rituximab arm versus 15% in the bendamustine plus rituximab arm (P <.001). Atrial fibrillation was reported in up to 17% of patients who received ibrutinib.

Clinical Implications

“This really does indicate that ibrutinib as front-line therapy, which many clinicians have been doing, is a very reasonable practice,” commented David P. Steensma, MD, Institute Physician, Hematologic Oncology Treatment Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

Ongoing clinical trials are investigating more specific second-generation BTK inhibitors, with potentially better safety profiles, as well as novel combination therapies, such as venetoclax (Venclexta) plus ibrutinib, with or without obinutuzumab (Gazyva), that do not include chemotherapy.

By using these new combinations “we try to intensify therapy earlier on, to try to get deeper remissions and therefore stop therapy,” Dr Woyach said. Limiting the duration of therapy may also be important to explore, she noted.

Related Items
Rapid Progress in Aggressive Hematologic Malignancies Highlighted at ASH 2018
Wayne Kuznar
January/February 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASH 2018 Highlights published on February 27, 2019
MURANO: Venetoclax-Rituximab at Fixed Duration Beats Chemo­immunotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory CLL
Phoebe Starr
January/February 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASH 2018 Highlights published on February 27, 2019 in Leukemia
Next-Generation BTK Inhibitor Highly Active in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma
Wayne Kuznar
January/February 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASH 2018 Highlights published on February 27, 2019 in Lymphoma
Researchers Identify First Mutation to Explain Resistance to Venetoclax
Phoebe Starr
January/February 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASH 2018 Highlights published on February 27, 2019 in Leukemia
First-Line Enasidenib Achieves Complete Remission in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and IDH2 Mutation
Charles Bankhead
January/February 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers’ Perspectives in Oncology: ASH 2018 Highlights published on February 27, 2019 in Leukemia
Last modified: February 27, 2019
  •  Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Oncology Practice Management
  • Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Care in Rheumatology
  • Rheumatology Practice Management
  • Urology Practice Management
  • Lynx CME