Skip to main content

IASLC Survey: Two Steps Forward, Two Steps Back in Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing

Web Exclusives - Disparities in Cancer Care, Oncology

People are more positive about the perception and frequency of biomarker testing than an earlier survey conducted in 2018, but barriers remain, according to results from a survey.1

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Global Survey on Biomarker Testing, which was released during IASLC’s World Conference on Lung Cancer 2024, generated 1677 responses from 90 countries and 14 medical disciplines and found a positive shift in the perception and frequency of biomarker testing.

Sixty-seven percent of the surveyed participants reported that more than half of patients with lung cancer are tested in their country, which is an increase from the 39% reported in 2018. Despite this progress, barriers remain prominent, with cost (27.2%), time (13.9%), and sample quality (13.8%) often cited as obstacles. Notably, 43% of respondents reported treating patients before receiving biomarker results.

The 2018 survey suggested that low adoption of biomarker testing was likely due to cost, lack of quality and standards, access, awareness, and long turnaround times. However, since 2018, numerous therapeutic advances have been made in late-stage and early-stage lung cancer, according to Matthew Smeltzer, PhD, of the University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, who was cited in a release about the survey.

Survey respondents suggested a number of methods to improve biomarker testing, including enhanced education for providers and patients, streamlined clinical processes through reflex testing, increased funding from both governmental and insurance sources, and broader policy changes. The IASLC plans to launch a series of initiatives to address these areas, targeting awareness, access, processes, and policy improvements.

The survey was available in English, French, Japanese, Chinese, Portuguese, and Spanish, and contained sections on demographics, current practices and perceptions, pathology, ordering tests or treatment, acquiring tissue, barriers to optimal testing, and potential solutions. The researchers grouped responses by IASLC global region and by high/upper-middle income countries (HUMIC) and low/middle income countries (LMIC).

Respondents from HUMIC expressed greater healthcare system support for biomarker testing compared with those from LMIC, where only 18.6% noted similar support. The survey also revealed that a substantial proportion of testing costs are only partially reimbursed, and turnaround times for tissue testing average 14 days with no clear consensus on the causes of delays, the researchers reported.

Reference

  1. IASLC. IASLC global survey on biomarker testing reveals progress and persistent barriers in lung cancer biomarker testing. Press release. September 7, 2024. Accessed September 24, 2024. www.iaslc.org/iaslc-news/press-release/iaslc-global-survey-biomarker-testing-reveals-progress-and-persistent
Related Items
AI Assessing Mammograms Better Than Radiologists
Online First published on August 19, 2025 in Oncology, Technology
Emerging Tech Meets Equity: How AI Could Reshape Healthcare
Online First published on August 14, 2025 in Oncology, Technology
505(b)(2) Drugs: Creating New Chaos for Infusion Centers
Online First published on May 15, 2025 in Practice Management, Oncology
Ongoing Analyses and Recent Data for Talvey in Multiple Myeloma
Rohan Vashi, PharmD, MSc
November 2024 Vol 17, Payers' Guide to FDA Updates published on November 26, 2024 in In-Depth Treatment Profile, Multiple Myeloma, Oncology, Bispecific Antibodies
Addressing Cancer Health Disparities: The No One Left Alone Initiative
Rohan Nathwani, Arva Patel, Warner Kornberg, Asutosh Gor, MD, Sashi Naidu, MD, Viral Rabara, MD, Niyati Nathwani, MD, Kashyap Patel, MD
Web Exclusives published on May 14, 2024 in Disparities in Cancer Care, Oncology
Last modified: October 30, 2024