Skip to main content

Bendamustine Outperforms R-CHOP in NHL

August 2012 Vol 5, No 5, Special Issue ASCO 2012 Payers' Perspective - Leukemia, Oncology

Chicago, IL—The phase 3 clinical trial StiL NHL1 demonstrated that the combination of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) delays progression in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) long­er than standard treatment with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin HCl-vincristine sulfate-prednisone chemo­therapy plus rituximab (R-CHOP).

In this multicenter trial, BR more than doubled the median progression-free survival (PFS) compared with R-CHOP, reported Mathias J. Rummel, MD, PhD, Head of Hematology, Uni­versity Hospital in Giessen, Germany, at a plenary session at ASCO 2012.

“BR is not only less toxic but also more effective than the most-often-used first-line approach and should be considered a preferred first-line treatment for these patients,” he said.

Bendamustine is approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and as a second-line therapy for rituximab-refractory NHL, but US oncologists have not yet fully adopted this regimen, despite positive results presented at the 2009 American Society of Hematology meeting, which led to its approval in the United States. BR is listed as a recommended regimen by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

The StiL NHL1 Trial Details
A total of 549 patients with a new diagnosis of stage III or IV indolent NHL were randomized to standard R-CHOP or to BR. After a median follow-up of 45 months, the median PFS was 69.5 months with BR versus 31.2 months with R-CHOP, a 42% reduction in the risk of progression (P <.001). The PFS benefit offered by BR was seen across all subgroups, except for patients with marginal zone lymphoma, where PFS was comparable. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates, however, were similar—80.1% with BR and 77.8% with R-CHOP.

Dr Rummel explained that the lack of difference in OS is not unexpected, since patients with indolent lymphoma live a long time. Also, many in the R-CHOP arm crossed over to receive BR when their disease progressed, which dilutes a survival difference between the arms. BR also was associated with significantly less toxicity, with only skin toxicity being more common with this simpler regimen, he added.

Michael E. Williams, MD, Chief of Hematologic Malignancies at the University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, discussed the findings. “BR provides equivalent or better responses versus R-CHOP, and with less toxicity,” he said. “StiL NHL1 establishes BR as a front line regimen for indolent B-cell NHL and non–transplant-eligible mantle-cell lymphoma patients.”

Studies of this regimen are ongoing. The StiL NHL 7-2008 trial will evaluate data on the effect of rituximab maintenance after BR treatment.—CH

Related Items
AI Assessing Mammograms Better Than Radiologists
Online First published on August 19, 2025 in Oncology, Technology
Emerging Tech Meets Equity: How AI Could Reshape Healthcare
Online First published on August 14, 2025 in Oncology, Technology
505(b)(2) Drugs: Creating New Chaos for Infusion Centers
Online First published on May 15, 2025 in Practice Management, Oncology
Ongoing Analyses and Recent Data for Talvey in Multiple Myeloma
Rohan Vashi, PharmD, MSc
November 2024 Vol 17, Payers' Guide to FDA Updates published on November 26, 2024 in In-Depth Treatment Profile, Multiple Myeloma, Oncology, Bispecific Antibodies
IASLC Survey: Two Steps Forward, Two Steps Back in Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing
Web Exclusives published on October 29, 2024 in Disparities in Cancer Care, Oncology
Last modified: August 30, 2021